Downloaded from https://www.everyspec.com 2–17. Trainer/training developers The principal Trainer/Training Developer (T/TD) is TRADOC. Other T/TDs include AMC, MEDCOM, INSCOM, and USACE. To ensure the ILS program fulfills T/TD needs, these T/TDs will— a. Participate in the SIPT. b. Determine training (including embedded training) and training device requirements in accordance with the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) outlined in AR 350–38. c. Develop or acquire the training capabilities and coordinate analysis and data requirements with other SIPT members to ensure integration. d.
Provide complete initial and/or follow-on training for operation and support of newly fielded systems and for sustained support of fielded systems. e. Determine and submit system training plans to HQ, USACE (CEMP–DA) and gaining ACOM, ARNG, ASCC, USAR, and DRUs for development of training facility requirements. f. Conduct training evaluations to assess compatibility between field operations and training, doctrine, organizations, and fielded systems. g. Provide evaluation, feedback, and lessons learned to doctrine, training and combat developers, and other appropri- ate action elements. 2–18. Commanders, Army Commands, Army National Guard, U.S.
Army Reserve, Army Service Component Commands and Direct Reporting Units Commanders of gaining Army Commands (ACOMs), Army National Guard (ARNG), U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), Army Service Component Commands (ASCCs), and Direct Reporting Units (DRUs) will participate in the ILS process by planning for receipt of new, modified/upgraded, and displaced systems. The commanders of gaining ACOM, ARNG, USAR, ASCC, and DRUs will— a. Provide advice to the Army logistician, PM, and CBTDEV on matters pertaining to the expected system operational employment and support. b. Negotiate/sign PBA for materiel systems utilizing PBL strategies. c.
Coordinate with the gaining PM and LCMC, providing signed copies of the PBA of the fielding materiel systems. The PBA will be provided to the Commander, ACOM, ARNG, USAR, ASCC, or DRU; the DCS, G–4 (Logistics Division); and the DCS, G–3 (Force Structure Division). 2–19. Army Integrated Logistics Support Executive Committee The Army Integrated Logistics Support Executive Committee (AILSEC) provides a forum for representatives of Army organizations to plan, discuss, and resolve ILS policy issues, concerns, and procedures and to provide advice and counsel regarding implementation of the Army ILS program. The AILSEC will— a. Develop policies and procedures for conduct of the DA ILS reviews. b.
Establish mid- and long-range ILS goals and objectives. c. Review the ILS process for adequacy and identification of functional requirements, which should be expanded, clarified, or updated to improve the ILS process. d . R e c o m m e n d p o l i c y a n d p r o c e d u r e s t h a t w i l l i m p r o v e I L S a n d a s s i s t i n t h e i r e s t a b l i s h m e n t a n d e f f e c t i v e implementation. e.
Prioritize ILS tasks that will improve relationships, processes, and communications among Army commands within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology) (OASA (ALT)); Headquarters, AMC; Life-Cycle Management Commands (LCMCs); LOGSA; and other Army/DOD activities. f. Ensure development and coordination of ILS education, training, and career programs. g. Identify, review, and recommend resolution of systemic logistics support issues. 2–20.
Other participants Other participants in the system acquisition process shall provide timely review, approval, or submission of applicable ILS or ILS-related documents and accomplishments and report on the status of tasks identified in the supportability strategy and associated fielding documents. Chapter 3 Process and Framework 3–1. Purpose The purpose of the ILS process is to— a. Introduce and sustain fully supportable materiel systems in current and projected environments that meet opera- tional and system readiness objectives (SRO) at minimum LCC. 8 AR 700–127 • 27 September 2007