ADS-79D-HDBK Downloaded from https://www.everyspec.com APPENDIX K VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF CBM PROCESSES K.1 SCOPE This appendix provides the general guidance for the Verification and Validation of diagnostics-based Maintenance Credits and Prognostics Processes. . These approaches are not the only methods. This guidance material does not address Validation & Verification (V&V) best practices that would normally be utilized throughout product and system development cycles. To be specific about our objective and these terms, Verification provides testing or other evidence that the application meets its specifications.
Validation provides testing or other evidence that the application performs as intended in the operational and maintenance environment of the aircraft.
K.2 REFERENCES AND APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS (Copies of these documents are available online at https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.) (Copies of these documents are available online at http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/ ) (Copies of these documents are available online at or https://dap.dau.mil/policy/Pages/overview.aspx ) (Copies of this document are available from http://prod.sandia.gov ) 184 MILITARY STANDARDS MIL-HDBK-1823 Non-Destructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment.
Department of Defense, 2009 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FAA AC 29-2C MG15- Airworthiness Approval of Rotorcraft Health Usage Monitoring Systems (HUMS) FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION FAR/JAR Parts 27, 29 - Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft, Transport category rotorcraft. VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (V&V) SAND 2003 – 3769 Verification, Validation, and Predictive Capability in Computational Engineering and Physics, Sandia National Laboratories, 2003.