Downloaded from https://www.everyspec.com Table 4–1 Full materiel release requirements—Continued Aspect Characteristic Activity/document Functional authority Notes: 1 The HHA report is provided by the CHPPM on behalf of TSG. 2 Determine EOD statement applicability using DA Pam 700–142. EOD statement will certify that validated and verified render safe and disposal procedures, tools and equipment, and training aids are fielded to Army EOD units and EOD schools at least 30 days prior to materiel release and that the new materiel is fully supportable by EOD units.
It will also certify that the Joint Service TM 60 series have been approved by the Military Technical Acceptance Board at least 30 days prior to materiel release (see AR 75–15 to determine the materiel developer’s responsibility for EOD supportability compliance during the de- velopment of the new materiel). 3 The Environmental Statement must certify that the requirements of AR 200–1 and 32 CFR 651 have been met. 4 A memorandum will be provided by all functional authorities to the PM to address any activity/document that is not required for MR based upon program and tailoring of requirements. This will be accomplished at milestone B.
5 Organizations not assigned AMC LCMC support will substitute MDA approved organizations when using table (for example, PEO simulation and instru- mentation and JPEO CBD). 6 The CSLA COMSEC statement is not required when the materiel does not contain stand-alone COMSEC devices and supporting materials. 7 The supportability certification will verify that key aspects of SS have been achieved; detail any known shortfalls and include with a recommended get-well plan. A system receiving an FMR that has ASIOE at less than FMR must get acceptance from the GC prior to fielding.
8 The TMDE supportability statement is not required if TMDE is not being provided to the operator or field/sustainment maintenance provider. 9 The PM will provide documented proof of type classification for materiel requiring TC. A TC–STD designation is required for a FMR. Status of open issues and planned interim measures from TC will be documented by the PM and included in the MR package. 10 The SDDC transportability statement is not required if a system is found to be a transportability NON-problem item in accordance with with AR 70–47. 11 USAMMA will provide an Army logistician assessment, system effectiveness assessment, and safety statement for medical materiel. 4–6.
Criteria for full materiel release The MR authority will authorize full MR when the criteria in table 4–2 are met. These criteria are based on the activities required in paragraph 4–5 and table 4–1. Table 4–2 Full materiel release determination guidelines Criteria Request for FMR 18 AR 700–142 • 26 March 2008 Supportable Ten integrated logis- tics support (ILS) ele- ments (see AR 700–127) 26. Supportability certification —will also address sup- port materiel (COEI and ASIOE) to end item and soft- ware (see AR 700–127)7 27. USATA supportability statement on TMDE/ATE (see AR 750–43)8 28. TC designation9 29.
SDDC Transportation Engineering Agency transpor- tability statement (see AR 70–47) 10 30. Army logistician assessment (see AR 700–127)11 31. Supporting statements for COEI and ASIOE 32. Software supportability statement (normally pro- vided by software engineering center of LCMC) Lead LCMC4, 5 ILS center or ILS directorate Key system safety aspects have been reviewed and verified by the supporting safety office. —All known safety hazards have been identified, eliminated or accepted through the SSRA process in accordance with AR 385–10. —All statutory requirements are met, to include— (1) NRC licenses (10 CFR). (2) Hazardous material transportation (to include explosives) (49 CFR).
(3) Environmental protection (40 CFR). —-Applicable regulatory requirements are met, to include— (1) HHA. (2) ATEC/DTC safety confirmation. (3) Safety Review Board Certifications. (4) Airworthiness release. (5) EOD statement of supportability. The materiel has been tested and evaluated in accordance with the approved test and eval- uation master plan; key perform- ance in areas of effectiveness, survivability, MANPRINT, relia- bility, and supportability has been established and accepted by functional authorities.
—Established requirements of the capabilities documents, performance specifications, and purchase description have been met or a decision has been made by the CBTDEV to accept the current per- formance without further improvement required with G–3/5/7 endorsement.1 —Reliability, availability, and maintainability requirements have been achieved. 2 —Fire control solutions are in place or have a suitable workaround. —Software (to include embedded software within platforms) has attained full or conditional AIC.