Downloaded from https://www.everyspec.com c. Equipment transferred between commands in other than unit sets will meet the requirements in paragraph 6–1 a . In addition, equipment will not be transferred until all corrective actions requiring parts are completed and Field and Sustainment maintenance requests are completed. d. When equipment does not meet the transfer standard outlined in paragraph a, the losing commander will transfer the appropriate funding to the GC or request relief from this policy from the DCS, G–8 (DAPR–FDR). Appropriate justification will be provided with this request. e. Commanders will establish the standard for materiel transferred between units within the command.
Use of Army maintenance standard (TM XX–10 and TM XX–20 series PMCS) is encouraged. Army Command/Army Service Component Command (ASCC)/Direct Reporting Unit (DRU) commanders will provide necessary maintenance re- sources and assign responsibility for repair of materiel within the command. f. Equipment turn-in is accomplished as follows: (1) Equipment turned in for depot overhaul is not required to meet the transfer standards outlined above. Equipment will be turned in “as is complete” (including BII and COEI), unless an exception is made by AMC.
(2) Materiel within a unit that is excess as a result of changes in authorization documents or displaced equipment will be turned in using the turn-in criteria outlined in paragraph 6–1 a , unless an exception is made by the LCMC. The LCMC may provide an exception for equipment accepted for depot overhaul or rebuild, equipment being disposed of, or other equipment if an appropriate reason exists. Other excess materiel may be turned in to the supporting supply activity in “as is” condition. (3) Materiel above the unit level (that is, supply support activity or APS sustainment) reported excess will— (a) Not be scheduled for repair or maintenance services unless directed by the LCMC IMMC.
(b) Be maintained in its present condition by the owning organization. (c) Not be cannibalized or involved in parts substitution without prior authorization from the LCMC IMMC. g. Exceptions include— (1) Aviation equipment transferred between property accounts, which will conform to the serviceability criteria contained in TM 1–1500–328–23. (2) Equipment used as training aids and assembled and disassembled, which will be assigned a condition code of “F” or less. Depot overhaul is required to transfer or reissue this equipment. Equipment used for base operations or for the original purpose operator/crew training will meet the transfer/turn-in standard. h.
The DCS, G–3/5/7 and Headquarters, AMC control distribution of several hundred Army systems, and they are listed on the HQDA LIN list. (1) The DCS, G–8 controls distribution of these items via the ERPS. (2) All other displaced and excess items will be redistributed in accordance with AR 710–2.The operational situation may dictate that the system/materiel being released to a unit under UMR remain deployed in a theater of operations as the unit rotates out and another unit rotates to replace them. (3) This theater-provided equipment will be identified to the losing and gaining units by a DCS, G–3/5/7 message (DAMO–CI). The PM will be an info addressee on these messages.
(a) Accountability for this TPE will be transferred from the current unit property book officer to the AFSB and responsibility transferred from unit to unit as governed by AR 710–2. (b) Other inter-theater transfers are prohibited unless approved by the DCS, G–8. 6–2. Displaced equipment fielding Displaced equipment fielding (cascading) is a redistribution of an existing Army capability from one organizational element to another (normally from losing command to GC). This equipment may be new to the gaining unit, but it is not new to the Army.
The redistribution of equipment after initial fielding is an Army sustainment responsibility to be funded from the Army operation and maintenance accounts. a. The PM will program and budget the appropriate operation and maintenance funding through their supporting LCMC. As with TPF, DEF will provide a total package of materiel and coordinate for DET to assure the capability to operate and maintain the redistributed equipment in the using unit. The PM is also charged with execution of DEF and may delegate the execution to another command as long as funding is provided. b.
When Army systems on the DCS, G–8 force development managed LIN list are displaced and scheduled to be transferred to a command that has not yet used or supported them, additional planning similar to new system fielding may be required. The DEF may then require— (1) Comprehensive ILS planning with an MTP or MOA. (An MTP will be used to describe the DEF.) Materiel transfer plan is discussed in DA Pam 700–142. (2) A materiel transfer team. (3) Displaced equipment training with a DET team. (4) Total package fielding methods. c.
The principles and techniques of ILS management and TPF will be applied to plan, track and execute DEF to assure delivery of complete and fully supportable materiel systems. 38 AR 700–142 • 26 March 2008