I Downloaded from https://www.everyspec.com MIL-STD-81OD 19 July 1983 I-4.2 Yest interruut~. In the event of an unprogrammed test interruption, the cause of the interruption should be analyzed to determine the likelihood that environmental stress conditions present at the interruption could occur in service. The test should be resumed at the point of interruption using the same specific test item. If the test item has been damaged, it may be. necessary to start the test over using a oew test item. ., I-4.3 ~test reauirementa. When failures occur during qualificatiori,the~~ failure will be fixed as appropriate.
The test will be restarted and ruri through the complete qualification cycl”eto verify the fix. Parts which survive a complete qualification cycle are considered tO have passed and are- repaired only if required to finish the retest. & I-4.4 @ertes t. An interruption in the test that results in a more extreme exposure of the test item than required by the equipment specification’should ,, ‘be followed by a complete physical inspection of the test item:and an operational check prior to continuation of the test.” An engineering judgment : shall be made whether to continue testing with the specific item given the . overtest, to obtain a new item, or to consider the test’completed.
I-4:5 Fai~ti All incidents”” where the test items do not ~eet - the equipment operating‘requirementsshall be analyzed to”determine t,hecause and impact of such occurrences.. Corrective actions shall be proposed .or I implemented as required to meet equipment performance requirements. I-5. ,,. , a. Dreher, J .F., Lankin, E.D. Lankin, E.A. Tone. ‘VibroacOustic“. . Environment and Test Criteria for Aircraft Stores during Captive Flight”. o Shock and ‘JlbratlOnBulletim 39, Supplement (April 1969), PP 15-40. b. Dreher, J.F. ,lEfect~ of Vibration and Acoustic Noise On Aircraft/’ Stores Compatibility!t. IN: Aircraft Compatibility Symposium, Eglin AFB, Florida, November 1969, VO1 6. pp 245-272. c.
Burkhard, A.H. t!ACOustic Testing to Simulate the Flight Vibration Environment of Aircraft Stores”. February 1974. AFFDL-TR-73-110, DTIC number AD-919-543L. d. Burkhard, A.H., IIcapti.fe Flight Acoustic Test Criteria for Aircqaft Stores!!. Shock and V1bratlon BU . . lletm 43 Part 3 (January 1973), PP 113-126. . 1980 NATO AGARD, “ConferenceProceedings No. CP270. e. Meeker, B.D. and W.D. Everett. ,,u.s. Navy Experience on the E ffkcts of Carrier-Aircraft Environment on Guided Missiles’t. f. Heller, H., G. Holmes, and E. Covert. “F1ow Induced pr~ssure Oscillations in Shallow Cavities”. December 1970. AFFDL-TR-70-1~4. DTIC .5 number AD-880-496. .,,.. g. Smith, D., and L. Shaw.
l!predi~tiOnof pressure oscillations in Cavities Exposed to Aerodynamic Flow”. October 1975. AFFDL-TR-75-34. DTIC number AD-AO18-518. M3THOD 515.3 19 July 1983 515.3-6