Downloaded from https://www.everyspec.com c. Provide the Physical Security Equipment Management Office (PSEMO) (formerly the Product Manager, Physical Security Equip- ment) with information copies of all IDS engineering surveys per- formed by USACE. Inform the PSEMO if site designs require the use of nonstandard equipment. d. Develop and maintain guidance and criteria documents, and provide training for planning, evaluation, application, design, instal- lation, and construction of projects requiring physical security and anti–terrorism related protective construction and equipment. e.
Develop requirements and execute programs for research and development efforts supporting physical security and anti–terrorism related protective construction, and PSE applications. f. Identify problem areas that impact on the design and installa- tion of IDS and other PSE. g. Maintain centers of expertise for protective design and for IDS to provide assistance to all Army elements on a reimbursable basis in physical security and IDS, respectively. h. Coordinate security engineering surveys with MACOM pro- vost marshals (PMs). i. Be responsible for additional specific procedural tasks per para- graphs 4–4 and 4–7. j.
Provide one voting member (lieutenant colonel, major, or civil- ian equivalent) to the APSEAG per paragraph 4–5. k. Under the HQUSACE— (1) The Commander, USACE, Omaha District, will provide one advisory member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equivalent) to the AP- SEAG per paragraph 4–5. (2) The Commander, USACE, Huntsville Division, will provide one advisory member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equivalent) to the APSEAG per paragraph 4–5. necessary to implement these concepts (doctrine, training, organiza- tion, and materiel). Establish an operational tester for all Army IDS and other PSE. c. Provide training and doctrine support in developing physical security procedures and measures. d.
Comply with AR 71–9 by ensuring the materiel, training, per- sonnel, logistics, doctrine, tactics, and essential–related system re- q u i r e m e n t s f o r a n i t e m o f P S E a r e , t h r o u g h o u t t h e m a t e r i e l acquisition process— (1) Identified. (2) Integrated early. (3) Tested. (4) Refined. e. Ensure the requirements in para 1–17d above are included in— (1) Requirements documents. (2) Development contracts. (3) Tests. (4) Evaluations. (5) Other key actions in the acquisition of materiel systems. f. Determine future Army user requirements for PSE. g.
Ensure, in conjunction with CG, AMC, and as an integral part of the combat development process, that physical security require- ments and related subsystems, measures, and procedures are identi- fied in the developmental process for new materiel systems. h. Evaluate physical security information (directives, ideas, con- cepts, requested for assistance) that flow to HQ, TRADOC from many sources, to include HQDA, other services, other commands, and individuals. i.
In conjunction with the user representative for specified physi- cal security requirements— (1) Develop operational concepts and plans designed to improve the physical security posture of the Army; and, when appropriate, to i m p l e m e n t p h y s i c a l s e c u r i t y p o l i c y a s e s t a b l i s h e d b y HQDA(DAMO–ODL). (2) Determine PSE research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) requirements designed to correct for deficiencies; imple- ment approved physical security operational concepts and plans. (3) Coordinate with other MACOMs to identify requirements for PSE; coordinate the preparation and staffing within the Army of requirements documents. j.
Designate a representative (MAJ or higher rank officer or civil- ian equivalent) to the DOD Joint Requirements Working Group (JRWG). k. Provide one voting member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equiva- lent) to the APSEAG per paragraph 4–5. l. Under TRADOC, require the Commandant, U.S. Army Mili- tary Police School (USAMPS), to provide one nonvoting representa- tive to the DAPSRB per paragraph 7–3. 1–14. Chief of Engineers (COE) The COE will— a. Assure physical security design criteria are considered for pro- posed MCA projects in compliance with Army military construction policy. b. Maintain an overview of the physical security design program and activities pertaining thereto. c.
Provide administrative and technical advice and assistance and make recommendations on physical security construction matters to the ASA(I,L&E) and HQDA Staff Agencies. d. Provide one voting member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equiva- lent) to the DAPSRB, per paragraph 7–3. 1–15. The Chief, Army Reserve The Chief, Army Reserve, will— a. Provide one voting member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equiva- lent) to the DAPSRB, per paragraph 7–3. b. Provide one advisory member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equiva- lent) to the APSEAG per paragraph 4–5. 1–18.
CG, AMC The CG, AMC, is responsible for providing an Army Executive Agent for PSE who will be the Army single point of contact and central manager for planning, acquisition, deployment, installation, and support of PSE, including conventional, nuclear, and chemical. AMC will require— a. The Army Executive Agent for PSE to — (1) Provide DA representation (general officer, or civilian equiv- alent) to the DOD PSE Steering Group. (2) Provide one voting member (colonel (COL), LTC, or civilian equivalent) representing DA to the DOD Physical Security Equip- ment Action Group (PSEAG). (3) Provide a chairman (COL, LTC, or civilian equivalent) to preside over the APSEAG. b.
The Project Manager for Nuclear Munitions (PM NUC) to provide one voting member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equivalent) to the APSEAG per paragraph 4–5. c. The CG, U.S. Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC), to provide one advisory member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equivalent) to the APSEAG per paragraph 4–5. d. The Director, Intelligence Materiel Activity (IMA), to provide 1–16. The Chief, National Guard Bureau The Chief, National Guard Bureau, will— a. Provide one voting member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equiva- lent) to the DAPSRB, per paragraph 7–3. b. Provide one advisory member (LTC, MAJ, or civilian equiva- lent) to the APSEAG per paragraph 4–5. 1–17.
The CG, TRADOC The CG, TRADOC, is principal Army combat developer, doctrine developer, trainer, and user representative. In this capacity, when research and development of PSE is required, the CG, TRADOC, will— a. Formulate concepts, doctrine, organizational structure, materiel objectives, and requirements to employ U.S. Army forces— (1) In a theater of operations. (2) In control of civil disturbances. (3) To secure garrisons. (4) To combat terrorism. b. Develop physical security concepts and determine the actions 2 AR 190–13 • 30 September 1993