Downloaded from https://www.everyspec.com be evaluated at least once every year. Certification that the evaluation has been conducted must be accomplished in accordance with AR 11–2 on DA Form 11–2 R. B–16. Test questions a. Has the MON for the materiel system been prepared and provided to the gaining command, as specified in AR 700–142, paragraph 5–3? b. Has an MFP been prepared and coordinated in accordance with DA Pam 700–142? c. Has a complete MSP been prepared by the gaining command and submitted to the fielding command as specified in AR 700–142, paragraph 5–6? d. Has a separate MFA been prepared and coordinated with each gaining command? e. Is the materiel fielder providing a MFT? f.
Have handoff requirements been identified and coordinated in the MFP/MFA? g. Has the fielding command identified all items required to initially support the system on the MRL? h. Is the initial fielding of end items of equipment to each level limited to those authorized by MTOE, TDA, CTA, or Joint TOA? i. Were the facilities and infrastructure necessary to conduct TPF identified, planned, programmed and provided? j. Was a joint inventory performed by MFT (if applicable) with gaining command and DA Form 5684–R signed by representatives from both fielding and gaining commands? k. Did the fielding command indicate missing, defective, and damaged items on DA Form 5684? l.
Has all funding been identified, budgeted, and programmed, and distributed in accordance with AR 700–142, paragraph 5–15? m. Is this fielding part of a USF? If so, have the materiel fielding and transfer plans been coordinated and synchronized to ensure a successful USF? B–17. Supersession This checklist replaces the checklist for materiel fielding previously published in AR 700–142, dated 21 February 2006. B–18. Comments Help make this a better tool for evaluating materiel fielding. Submit comments to the ASA(ALT) (SAAL–ZL), 103 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310–0103. Section IV Material Transfer B–19. Function The function covered by this checklist is materiel transfer. B–20.
Purpose To assist losing and gaining commands in evaluating their key management controls. It is not intended to cover all controls. B–21. Instructions Answers to the below evaluation must be based on the actual testing of controls (for example, document analysis, direct observation, interviewing, sampling, simulation, evaluation reports, and so forth). Answers that indicate deficien- cies must be explained, and corrective action indicated in supporting documentation. These management controls must be evaluated at least once every year. Certification that the evaluation has been conducted must be accomplished in accordance with AR 11–2 on DA Form 11–2 R. B–22. Test questions a.
Is the displaced equipment being redistributed within the supply support activities geographic area to fill shortages for authorized equipment? b. If local shortages do not exist, has the displaced excess equipment been reported through channels to the managing national inventory control point for appropriate disposition instructions as coordinated with HQDA, DCS, G–8? c. Is the displaced system being transferred within a command? d. If transferred within a command, are normal intra-command redistribution procedures being used? e. Was a MTP or MOA prepared for the command to command transfer of the redistributed system? f. Is this materiel transfer part of a USF?
If so, have the materiel fielding and transfer plans been coordinated and synchronized to ensure a successful USF? 47 AR 700–142 • 26 March 2008