Why you should act again The first application was declared i nvalid only because local residents and campaigners repeatedly highlighted flaws that were identified by our diligent professionals That the application is now live again — with only minor changes — demonstrates how little regard the applicant has for the unsuitability of the site. The community cannot afford to relent . Every objection raised last time remains valid. However, the removal of the BESS addresses only one of many issues while simultaneously weakening the developer’s justification for the scheme’s benefits . The balance between harm and benefit — already unfavourable — has worsened.
The developer hopes residents will tire of fighting . We must demonstrate they are wrong. 5